MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2263936307 · doi:10.1111/zsc.12157

Cladistic analysis of <scp>A</scp>radidae (<scp>I</scp>nsecta, <scp>H</scp>eteroptera) based on morphological and molecular characters

2015· article· en· W2263936307 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueZoologica Scripta · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicHemiptera Insect Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAgence Nationale de la RechercheOntario Neurotrauma Foundation
KeywordsParaphylyBiologyMonophylyCladisticsSister groupZoologyTaxonEvolutionary biologyPhylogenetic treeGeneticsCladeGeneBotany

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this study, we present for the first time a cladistic analysis of the subfamilies of A radidae, using molecular and morphological characters. Eighty‐three taxa, including 79 species representing eight subfamilies, are treated. The analyses were performed using 72 morphological characters and approximately 1650 bp corresponding to three molecular loci ( CO 1, 16 S and 28 S ). Characters were analysed using parsimony and B ayesian methods. Based on the combined analyses, we find support for the monophyly of A radidae, including the subfamilies A radinae, A neurinae, C alisiinae, I soderminae, and M ezirinae and the paraphyly of P rosympiestinae and C hinamyersiinae. In all analyses, P rosympiestinae includes I soderminae. The T ermitaphididae were not found sister to the A radidae in the A radoidea.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.483
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it