L`apres 8 mars au Canada anglais et au Québec: une celebration contrastée
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La couverture mediatique de la JIF 2005 au Canada anglais et au Quebec, produite majoritairement par des femmes, est surtout d'interet local, la dimension internationale servant le plus souvent de faire-valoir a la realite canadienne et quebecoise. Le feminisme est peu cite mais souvent en filigrane, a la fois l'objet de dures critiques et de joyeux eloges. Les medias canadiens anglais ont ete plus sensibles a l'information promotionnelle de l'organisme feministe federal au sujet de la jif et ceux du Quebec, a une actualite marquee par la « question masculine ». Les differences observees entre les journaux et les textes d'un meme quotidien temoignent par ailleurs de la marge de manoeuvre dont disposent les journalistes au pays, meme dans les medias conservateurs
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".