MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2264298412 · doi:10.5539/ijps.v8n1p162

The Relationship between Adolescent Development and Marriage in Cirendeu Village, District East Ciputat, South Tangerang, Banten Province of Indonesia

2016· article· en· W2264298412 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Djawahir Hejazziey

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Psychological Studies · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMarriage and Family Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPromiscuityPsychologyIslamPersonalitySample (material)Test (biology)Social psychologyDevelopmental psychologySocioeconomicsDemographyGeographySociologyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The aim in this study is to describe the adolescent development and marriage, this time quite contrary to marriage is based on the religion of Islam. This study uses a analisis quantitative, approach deskripitif and inferential analysis. The normality test analysis, correlation, regression analysis and uses Test-T. Sample is adolescents (residents) in the village Cireundeu, District East Ciputat, South Tangerang, Banten province. The total sample is 150 people. The results showed that there is a relationship between adolescent development and marriage. It is seen from a wedding going on in teenagers is not only formed from adolescent development, but also of other factors. It can be concluded that the marriage occurred among adolescents is one of the developments of promiscuity with their peers. This promiscuity occurs because of lack of understanding and knowledge of adolescents to promiscuity and a lack of understanding of the value of religion. Religious educations in adolescents to be conducted if want to changes in behavior and personality.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.037

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.120
GPT teacher head0.388
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Psychological StudiesSame topicMarriage and Family DynamicsFrench-language works237,207