MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2264406538 · doi:10.1002/cta.2197

Analysis and realization of a switched fractional‐order‐capacitor integrator

2016· article· en· W2264406538 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Circuit Theory and Applications · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Control Systems Design
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIntegratorCapacitorRealization (probability)Switched capacitorOrder (exchange)Electrical impedancePath (computing)MathematicsControl theory (sociology)Fractional calculusTopology (electrical circuits)Computer scienceElectronic engineeringElectrical engineeringEngineeringMathematical analysisVoltageCombinatorics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary Using fractional calculus, we analyze a classical switched‐capacitor integrator when a fractional‐order capacitor is employed in the feed‐forward path. We show that using of a fractional‐order capacitor, significantly large time constants can be realized with capacitances in the feedback path much smaller in value when compared with a conventional switched‐capacitor integrator. Simulations and experimental results using a commercial super‐capacitor with fractional‐order characteristics confirmed via impedance spectroscopy are provided. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.984
Threshold uncertainty score0.231

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it