MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Investigation of peptomimetics of GD2 antibodies as targeted therapy against human small cell lung cancer in-vitro

2006· article· en· W2264484328 on OpenAlexaff
Jonathan Wan, H. Uri Saragovi, HERBERT CONWAY, Ljubica Ivanisevic

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeuroblastoma Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMonoclonal antibodyLung cancerAntibodyMedicineCell cultureCancer researchFlow cytometryCellCell growthNeuroblastomaIn vivoImmunogenicityCancerImmunologyMolecular biologyBiologyPathologyInternal medicineBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

13128 Background: GD2 is a well-established target that has been validated for neuroblastoma and small cell lung cancer. The therapeutic and diagnostic use of monoclonal antibodies directed to GD2 in small cell lung cancer is well documented. It has been shown that the binding of GD2 monoclonal antibodies alone can induce growth suppression and cell death of small cell lung cancer cells in-vitro. Our laboratory has developed synthetic small molecule peptomimetics as ligands of GD2. Peptomimetics have favorable in-vivo pharmacological properties compared to antibodies with no immunogenicity, longer half-lives, low toxicity, good tissue penetration, biodistribution and high target selectivity. This study proposed to determine the efficacy of peptomimetics of GD2 antibodies against small cell lung cancer cells in-vitro. Methods: 2 human cell lines were studied. H69 is a classic small cell lung cancer and H82 is a morphological variant small cell lung cancer both of which have been reported in the literature to express GD2. Cell surface expression of ganglioside GD2 was analyzed by flow cytometry (FACScan, BD Biosciences) using GD2 mAB 3F8 and GD2 mAB ME361. Cell proliferation was assessed using standard MTT assays with serum containing medium and cultured for approximately 3 doubling times for each cell line. The cell lines were exposed to increasing doses of GD2 specific peptomimetic to a maximum of 25 uM with controls including serum containing media with and without a GD2 negative peptomimetic and assessed for cell proliferation. Results: GD2 expression was confirmed for both cell lines- H69 and H82 using FACs. Exposure of the GD2 specific peptomimetic clearly caused growth suppression on the range of 35–40% when compared to controls. A dose response relationship was demonstrated with a plateau beyond 10 uM concentrations. Each experiment repeated ≥ 3 occasions. Conclusions: We have shown that attachment of GD2 specific peptomimetics can cause decreased cell proliferation in 2 small cell lung cancer cell lines H69 and H82. We have shown that there is a dose response relationship by which these compounds reduce cell viability. Peptomimetics of GD2 antibodies show promise as a targeted therapy for small cell lung cancer in-vitro and warrant further study. [Table: see text]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.097
GPT teacher head0.458
Teacher spread0.361 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicNeuroblastoma Research and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207