MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2264547960 · doi:10.5623/cig2015-205

Novel integration strategy for GNSS-aided inertial Integrated Navigation

2015· article· en· W2264547960 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueGEOMATICA · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInertial Sensor and Navigation
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInertial measurement unitGNSS applicationsInertial navigation systemKalman filterComputer scienceGNSS augmentationDead reckoningSensor fusionKinematicsNavigation systemGlobal Positioning SystemReal-time computingArtificial intelligenceInertial frame of referenceTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The conventional integration mechanism in GNSS (Global Navigation Satellite Systems) aided inertial integrated positioning and navigation system is mainly based on the continuous outputs of the navigation mechanization, the associated error models for navigation parameters, the biases of the inertial measurement units (IMU), and the error measurements. Its strong dependence on the apriori error characteristics of inertial sensors may suffer with the low-cost IMUs, e.g. the MEMS IMUs due to their low and unstable performance. This paper strives for a significant breakthrough in a compact and general integration strategy which restructures the Kalman filter by deploying a system model on the basis of 3D kinematics of a rigid body and performing measurement update via all sensor data inclusive of the IMU measurements. This novel IMU/GNSS Kalman filter directly estimates navigational parameters instead of the error states. It enables the direct use of the IMU’s raw outputs as measurements in measurement updates of Kalman filter instead of involving the free inertial navigation calculation through the conventional integration mechanism. This realization makes all of the sensors in a system no longer to be differentiated between core and aiding sensors. The proposed integration strategy can greatly enhance the sustainability of low-cost navigation systems in poor GNSS and/or GNSS denied environment compared to the conventional aided error-state-based inertial navigation integration mechanism. The post-processed solutions are presented to show the success of the proposed multisensor integrated navigation strategy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.748
Threshold uncertainty score0.555

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it