A review of the Jaguar Cu-Zn-Ag VMS discovery and subsequent geophysical trials
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Jaguar is an Archaean volcanogenic massive sulphide (VMS) deposit is located approximately 250km NNW of Kalgoorlie, and about 4 km south of the historic Teutonic Bore Cu-Zn-Ag mine. The current mining reserve is 1.6mt @ 3.1% Cu, 11.7% Zn, 0.72% Pb and 120g/t Ag. Jabiru Metals Limited began mining the deposit in May 2007 via a 1.8 km long decline that reaches the top of the orebody, which is 300m below the surface. The underground operation has a planned life of five years. The Canadian company Inmet Mining Pty Ltd entered a joint venture with Jabiru?s predecessor, Pilbara Mines Ltd, to explore for VMS deposits in 2001 and discovered the Jaguar deposit in February 2002. Their exploration programme included a large FLEM survey that covered most of their tenure. The discovery drillhole, TBD-202, was the second of two holes drilled into an 1800m long FLEM conductor. The initial holes were planned 600m apart as Inmet Mining were chasing large targets. Following the technical success provided by the FLEM survey a range of electrical geophysical techniques were trialled over the Jaguar deposit. The results of these surveys are reviewed here.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".