MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2264588432 · doi:10.1096/fasebj.20.4.a203-b

Extracellular nucleotides mediate LPS‐induced IL‐8 release from monocytes and neutrophil migration.

2006· article· en· W2264588432 on OpenAlexafffund
Filip Kukulski, Fethia Ben Yebdri, Julie Lefebvre, Sébastien A. Lévesque, Jean Sévigny

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAdenosine and Purinergic Signaling
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsApyraseChemotaxisExtracellularNeutrophil extracellular trapsMonocyteChemistryCell biologyInflammationReceptorMolecular biologyImmunologyBiologyBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Extracellular nucleotides are released from activated, damaged or dead cells and drive inflammation by the stimulation of P2 receptors. We previously reported that the gram‐negative bacteria pathogen, LPS, released IL‐8 from monocytic THP‐1 cells via the activation of P2Y 6 receptor. In extension of this study, we now demonstrate that primary human monocytes treated with LPS or UDP also release IL‐8 and that this secretion mediates neutrophil migration. Importantly, the LPS‐induced IL‐8 release was blocked by a nucleotide scavenger (apyrase) and this blockage was not due to the formation of adenosine. We next tested the chemotactic activity of conditioned monocyte media on neutrophil migration using Boyden chambers with endothelial monolayers. The media of LPS‐stimulated monocytes recruited significantly more neutrophils than the corresponding media to which LPS was added simultaneously with apyrase. Conditioned media of UDP‐stimulated monocytes were as effective to induce neutrophil migration. In addition, IL‐8 neutralizing antibodies added to the media of LPS‐ or UDP‐treated monocytes almost completely abrogated their chemotactic activity. Therefore, extracellular nucleotides have the ability to recruit neutrophils to inflamed tissues by mediating IL‐8 release from human monocytes/macrophages. Supported by grants from the CIHR and The Arthritis Society.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicAdenosine and Purinergic SignalingFrench-language works237,207