Economic Slack Persists in the Euro Area. Business Cycle Report of May 2013
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
While the USA and Latin America are increasingly sending growth signals, economic activity in China has been losing some momentum since the start of this year. The euro area continues to struggle with problems. Business surveys conducted in April once more show increased scepticism about future economic developments. Much the same as the German economy, the Austrian economy also suffers from the slowdown in global demand. The OECD's Composite Leading Indicator suggests that global economic conditions will improve for the world economy as a whole from the second quarter of 2013. Austria's export sector may increasingly benefit from this development from the second half of the year. Activity remains subdued for the time being, and here, too, survey evidence shows that sentiment among domestic businesses is sceptical. In April, WIFO's leading indicator fell for the first time since October 2012. While inflation is receding, the job market reflects the impacts of the economic weakness. The number of persons employed is stagnant, while unemployment is rising.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it