MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Potential of Denufosol as an Early Intervention Therapy for CF Lung Disease

2010· article· en· W2264753530 on OpenAlexaff
Tomáš Navrátil, Amy Schaberg, Wei Tian, Todd A. Durham, Carole Evans, Christina Lindroos, Susan Barrus, Dave Mathews, M. G. Barnes, Félix Ratjen, Richard B. Moss, Frank J. Accurso

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInterstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePlaceboInternal medicineLungDiseaseGastroenterologyActivator (genetics)Pathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

CF lung disease arises from ion transport defect. Disease origins in small airways before 1 yr of age necessitate early intervention. Denufosol (DEN), a novel chloride channel activator, stimulates Cl − transport, inhibits Na + absorption and increases ciliary beat frequency. A Phase 3, double‐blind, placebo (PL)‐controlled trial (TIGER‐1) was conducted in 352 CF pts to compare inhaled DEN 60 mg TID to PL for 24 wks. Pts were ≥ 5 yrs (mean 14.6 yrs) and had FEV 1 ≥ 75% predicted (mean 92%). Pulmonary function tests and exacerbations, QOL measures and systemic exposure of DEN were evaluated. This work examines endpoints relevant to DEN use as an early intervention agent. The ability to reach small airways was confirmed by significant improvement in FEF 25%–75% in pts ≤ 110% predicted FEV 1 (p=0.025). There was little to no systemic exposure to denufosol, no accumulation with chronic dosing, and no evidence of systemic AEs including liver enzyme levels, blood biochemistry and differential cell counts. DEN's mechanism of action addressing the basic defect, the lack of systemic exposure and ability to target small airways makes this a potentially promising therapy for early intervention in CF lung disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicInterstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis→French-language works237,207→