Bibliographic record
Abstract
<p class="zhengwen"><span lang="EN-GB">Self-organizing map (SOM) is a type of artificial neural network for cluster analysis. Each neuron in the map competes with others for the input data objects in order to learn the grouping of the input space. Besides competition, neighbor neurons of a winning neuron also learn. SOM has a natural propensity to cluster data into visually distinct clusters, which show the intrinsic grouping of data.</span></p><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman','serif'; mso-bidi-font-size: 12.0pt; mso-fareast-font-family: 宋体; mso-font-kerning: 1.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-language: ZH-CN; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA;" lang="EN-US">The self-organizing map algorithm is heuristic in nature and will almost always converge. Since self-organizing map may be trapped in a local optimum, so we introduce momentum into the learning process thus the movement of a neuron may jump over local optimum. We expect this will be similar to the learning of neurons in back-propagation with momentum. Like the learning process in back-propagation, the timing for updating the amount of movement of a neuron is either batch mode or incremental mode. However, due to the neighborhood function, the movement of a non-winner neuron is relatively small as compare to when it is a winner. So when deciding the momentum, the previous movement of a neuron needs special consideration. Experiment result show that adding momentum to self-organizing map considerably contributes to the acceleration of the convergence.</span>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".