MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2264952219 · doi:10.4271/2010-01-0421

An Energy-Based Proper Model of an Automotive Fuel Delivery System

2010· article· en· W2264952219 on OpenAlexaff
Greg T. Browne, Nicholas Krouglicof, Geoff Rideout

Bibliographic record

VenueSAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic and Pneumatic Systems
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAutomotive industryAutomotive engineeringComputer scienceEnergy (signal processing)EngineeringAerospace engineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mathematical modeling is widely used throughout any scientific industry when trying to predict the behavior of dynamic systems. Oftentimes it is desirable that these models be simple and efficient, while still delivering accurate data. This paper builds and examines an energy-based (bond graph) model of an automotive fuel delivery system and suggests which elements are required to produce a Proper Model. The Model Order Reduction Algorithm (MORA) provides a mechanism to quantitatively rank each element in the model and determine its contribution to the system dynamics. Utilizing this approach, a model is developed that retains 98% of the complete system energy from 12 of the most active of 25 elements. This model requires 46.6% less simulation time while continuing to provide an adequate prediction of the system response.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper seriesSame topicHydraulic and Pneumatic SystemsFrench-language works237,207