MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Recommendations for integrating gender into the Rebuilding Agricultural Markets in Afghanistan program (RAMP) / Mary Hill Rojas, Zulaikha Aziz.

2004· book· en· W2265074780 on OpenAlexaff
Mary Rojas, Zulaikha Aziz

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgricultural Economics and Practices
Canadian institutionsWomen in Resource Development
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAgriculturePolitical scienceAgricultural scienceGeographyArchaeologyEnvironmental science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

RAMP, Rebuilding Agricultural Markets in Afghanistan Program, is a project ofUSAID implemented under a contract with Chemonics International. RAMP will improve food security and increase rural incomes by introducing practical methods for increasing crop and livestock productivity; strengthen agricultural markets by expanding financial services to micro, small and medium-sized agribusinesses; and strengthen farm and agribusiness competitiveness by rehabilitating rural irrigation systems, roads and local market facilities. All of these activities involve the participation of the men and women of the rural farm households and communities. Though RAMP is already funding activities in which rural women are involved there is a need to strengthen these activities and the overall gender dimension of the project.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.782
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAgricultural Economics and PracticesFrench-language works237,207