MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2265261221

Tales of transformation through children's global arts: a living dissertation

2007· dissertation· en· W2265261221 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Nadine Cruickshanks

Bibliographic record

VenueUVic’s Research and Learning Repository (University of Victoria) · 2007
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicArt Education and Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThe artsTransformation (genetics)Visual artsArtSociologyBiology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Since its inception in 2003, it is becoming increasingly evident that meaningful pursuits in the field of Children’s Global Arts can change lives. The specific intention of this research has been to document ‘tales of transformation’ as shared by various global arts participants to discover how individuals can alter the way they perceive the world and their role within it. 
\n\tThrough the power of art, story, and relationship, a renewed perspective of education emerges that compels us to look very differently at what it means to teach and to learn in an interdependent and fragile world. By the closing chapter, hope for humanity is restored by rethinking schools as agents for change where a focus on disposition and inquiry rather than curriculum and methodology, provide the value and significance for education in the 21st century.
\n\tChapter 1 opens up the dialogue by presenting the challenges facing many children in the world today, including those living in ‘privileged’ societies such as Canada. It also confronts the educational profession to assume its role and responsibility in addressing the problems and solutions that face children and the world.
\n\tChapter 2 provides background knowledge and theory in areas significant to this dissertation, including transformational learning, educational change, arts-based research, and child advocating philosophies.
\n\tChapter 3 explains my research intention and process, including a glimpse into humanistic and holistic pedagogy.
\n\tThe true beginning of this dissertation unfolds in Chapter 4 as stories begin to be told through a pivotal Children’s Global Art’s event - the Learning and the World We Want conference - held in Victoria in November 2003. The serendipitous nature of this initiative also unfolds through the highlighting of the Global Arts catalogue, DVD, website, Children`s Global Arts Foundation, and team approach. 
\n\tThe classroom and community scenarios revealed in Chapters 5-8 demonstrate ways in which the global arts project, under the mentorship of experienced educators and facilitators, have provided a safe environment for students of diverse age, background and worldview, to break through a “culture of silence” through creative and candid encounters with Self and Others. 
\n\tChapter 9 compels us to look critically at Canada’s privileged society and culture, and brings awareness to the prevailing paradox and hegemonic forces at play when considering global educational initiatives.
\n\tWeaving the global arts stories and patterns of this dissertation together, Chapter 10 highlights unifying elements of transformation, revealing answers to original research questions, and a refreshing sense of hope for our troubled world:
\n•\tHow are experiences in Children’s Global Arts shifting the ways those involved view the world and their role within it? 
\n•\tWhat are the key elements that contribute to those experiences?
\n\tChapter 11 outlines the implications and support for Children’s Global Arts at the classroom and school level by taking a closer look at basic school structures, and identifying ways in which they can be perceived differently in order to accommodate transformational understandings as identified in the preceding chapters of this dissertation. 
\nThe concluding Chapter (12) provides a final reflection of this research journey.
\nWoven throughout the chapters of this dissertation, readers will also come across a few interludes, and a multiple arrangement of images and discourses, that bring greater depth and meaning to this journey, and help to convey the interconnectedness of experiences worldwide.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.192
Threshold uncertainty score0.933

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUVic’s Research and Learning Repository (University of Victoria)Same topicArt Education and DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207