MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2265438955

Réfutation: L'élimination des gardes de 24 heures, est-ce la bonne décision?: NON

2013· article· fr· W2265438955 on OpenAlexaff
Jonathan Cools‐Lartigue

Bibliographic record

VenueEurope PMC (PubMed Central) · 2013
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicSleep and Work-Related Fatigue
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyPsychology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dre B-Lajoie maintient[1][1] que la fatigue des residents a des consequences indesirables. Par ailleurs, les effets nefastes de la fatigue des residents n'est pas l'objet du debat. Des periodes prolongees sans sommeil sont nocives pour n'importe qui. Parce qu'il s'agit la d'un enonce avec

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.040
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.065
Threshold uncertainty score0.219

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.040
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0650.021

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEurope PMC (PubMed Central)Same topicSleep and Work-Related FatigueFrench-language works237,207