MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2265463392

Abstract: The depositional regime of Early Triassic sedimentation in the Bjorne Formation on the eastern margin of the Sverdrup Basin, Ellesmere Island, Nunavut, Canada

2011· article· en· W2265463392 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Derrick Midwinter

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological Studies and Exploration
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologySiltstoneSedimentary depositional environmentPaleontologyFaciesMarine transgressionSverdrupSiliciclasticSedimentary rockStructural basinSedimentary structuresRed beds
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Bjorne Formation of the Canadian Arctic is a poorly understood, dominantly sandstone unit that occurs in the Sverdrup sedimentary basin in the northern part of the Arctic Islands. The aim of researching this formation is to unravel an important part of Sverdrup Basin evolution. The thickness of the Bjorne Formation nears 2000 m in the depocentres and 1000 m along the margins. The outcrop on Ellesmere Island was deposited on the eastern margin of the basin during three phases in the Early Triassic. Three sandstone members are separated by mudstone members. These mudstones are tongues of the stratigraphically equivalent Blind Fiord Formation in the deep basin that represent basin-wide transgression. The sediment was derived from the east and south of the basin and was sourced mainly from Devonian siliciclastic strata that flanked the basin and extended over the craton. Lithological and sedimentological features were observed and correlated to create facies associations for the lower member. Facies associations help create a depositional model for the entirety of the Bjorne Formation. This enables the understanding of the shifting basinal environment and dominant depositional regime during rapid sedimentation during the Early Triassic. In the lower member, there are hundreds of metres of stacked sandstones with red siltstone interbeds with planar stratification and primary current lineation. Shallow scours and mud rip-up clasts are present with potential antidune deposits. The red siltstone beds have climbing ripples, desiccation cracks, and slight bioturbation. These associations of sedimentary features give an indication of episodic and rapid sedimentation similar to a fluvial environment within the spectrum of braided rivers. There is also a marine association with interbedded sandstone and siltstone with hummocky cross stratification and intensive bioturbation. Deposition took place immediately following the PermianTriassic boundary. Extinction of many vegetational taxa at that boundary could have influenced fluvial styles because vegetation helps stabilize banks. The lack of meandering river deposits in the marine/non-marine transitional zone of the Bjorne Formation in the early Triassic could be in part the result of the extinction event. Petrographic information will be used to formulate a model for burial history by looking at compaction, cementation and

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.068

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.188
Teacher spread0.153 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological Studies and Exploration→French-language works237,207→