MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

MAXIMIZING THE GROWTH RATE UNDER RISK CONSTRAINTS

2009· article· en· W2265464138 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematical Finance · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicRisk and Portfolio Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEconomicsPortfolioRisk aversion (psychology)EconometricsErgodic theoryContext (archaeology)Incomplete marketsIsoelastic utilityMaximizationConstant (computer programming)Financial marketMathematicsValue at riskExpected utility hypothesisMathematical economicsMicroeconomicsFinancial economicsRisk managementComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We investigate the ergodic problem of growth‐rate maximization under a class of risk constraints in the context of incomplete, Itô‐process models of financial markets with random ergodic coefficients. Including value‐at‐risk , tail‐value‐at‐risk , and limited expected loss , these constraints can be both wealth‐dependent (relative) and wealth‐independent (absolute). The optimal policy is shown to exist in an appropriate admissibility class, and can be obtained explicitly by uniform, state‐dependent scaling down of the unconstrained (Merton) optimal portfolio. This implies that the risk‐constrained wealth‐growth optimizer locally behaves like a constant relative risk aversion (CRRA) investor, with the relative risk‐aversion coefficient depending on the current values of the market coefficients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.791
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it