An Order Estimation Based Approach to Identify Response Genes for Microarray Time Course Data
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Gene expression profiles from microarray time course experiments provide a unique opportunity to examine genome-wide signal processing and gene responses. A fundamental issue in microarray experiments is that the treatment condition can only be controlled at the cell level rather than at the gene level. The treatment condition does not affect all genes equally. Some genes depend on other genes to detect external changes. The dependency between genes is not fully deterministic and may vary with treatment condition. Thus the expression of each gene is potentially affected by two confounding effects: the treatment effect and the gene context effect arising from the regulatory interactions among genes. This gene context effect is hard to isolate. Neither can it be simply ignored. Instead, this gene context information which may be different under different treatment conditions is of primary biological interest. We introduce an approach which deals with the confounding effects and takes into account the uncontrollable gene context effect. Our method is based on the estimation of the number of hidden states, which, in our development, corresponds to the order of a hidden Markov model (HMM). For each gene, its observed expression is modeled by a gamma distribution determined by the corresponding hidden state at each time point. Those genes showing evidence for more than one hidden state can be categorized as the signalling genes, or in a wider sense, as the response genes which are coordinated by a cell system in reaction to a specific external condition. These response genes can be used in the comparison of different treatment conditions, to investigate the gene context effect under different treatments. Microarray time course data are also analyzed to demonstrate our method.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".