MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2265506512 · doi:10.1385/0-89603-471-2:217

Gene Replacement in Mycobacterium intracellulare

2003· article· en· W2265506512 on OpenAlexaff
Britt‐Inger Marklund, Richard W. Stokes

Bibliographic record

VenueHumana Press eBooks · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMycobacterium research and diagnosis
Canadian institutionsChild and Family Research InstituteBC Children's HospitalUniversity of British Columbia
FundersMedical Research Council
KeywordsMutantMutagenesisTransposon mutagenesisPhenotypeTransposable elementBiologyAntimycobacterialGeneMutationGeneticsMycobacteriumMycobacterium tuberculosisBacteriaTuberculosis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Much of the present knowledge of the bacterial cell emanates from studies of spontaneous mutants and mutants obtained as a result of random or directed mutagenesis. Spontaneous mutants in a specific gene can generally be Isolated only if the mutation leads to a selectable phenotype, e.g., mutations in the katG gene that result in resistance to the antimycobacterial agent isoniazld. Random mutagenesis of mycobacteria has recently been reported using mycobacterlal transposons ( 1 ). However, the hpld-rich cell wall of mycobacterla makes them hydrophobic, which leads to cell clumping. This clumping makes it laborious to purify a large number of separate clones and thereby obtain representative mutant libraries. In addition, the expansion and screening of such clones, which 1s necessary unless the mutant phenotype can be selected for, will be very tlmeconsummg, especially If working with slow-growing mycobacteria. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHumana Press eBooksSame topicMycobacterium research and diagnosisFrench-language works237,207