Frontières et transversalité: La mondialisation littéraire à l'épreuve du comparatisme canadien
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La torsion que subit depuis quelque temps deja la celebre formule de Northrop Frye deplace, de la specificite du lieu a un enjeu de localisation, la question de l'identite culturelle au Canada. Comme l'ont deja releve diverses reflexions critiques (dont celles de Richard Cavell et Joyce Zemans), Here is Where? saisit on ne peut mieux ce que sont aujourd'hui imperatifs et horizon de recherche. Ainsi peut-on dire qu'a l'inverse de la carte de Borges, les espaces litteraires complexifient aujourd'hui au Canada une territorialite geopolitique qui ne va plus de soi. Se pose donc a nous, en termes litteraires, la question qu'a su parfaitement synthetiser Arjun Appadurai dans Modernity at Large (52): What is the nature of locality as a lived experience in a globalized, deterritorialized world? Question que dedouble de surcroit le statut (desormais, de nouveau) problematique du comparatisme a titre precisement de pratique critique de localisation du savoir litteraire.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.014 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.034 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.013 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".