Bibliographic record
Abstract
AbstractThis study examines the process (dynamics) of the development of policies on land tenure during the Dutch colonial period in Bali. The study aims to examine policies on land in the agricultural sector, particularly in relation to the social economic impacts of the colonial administration’s land tenure policies in Balinese villages. Peasants as direct producers who are at the very bottom of a larger social-economic structure find themselves bearing the heaviest impact, while farmers or the elite group of non-producer instead reaps up benefits from a wide variety of mechanisms implemented to withdraw surpluses from peasants.Keywords: peasant, policy, land tenure, Dutch colonial governmentAbstrakTulisan ini mempelajari proses (dinamika) perkembangan kebijakan pengaturan penguasaan tanah pada masa pemerintahan kolonial Hindia-Belanda di Bali. Dalam kajian ini hendak disoroti bagaimanakah kebijakan pertanahan di bidang agraris; khususnya berkenaan dengan implikasi sosial-ekonomi dari kebijakan penguasaan tanah pemerintah kolonial tersebut di pedesaan di Bali. Kaum petani sebagai produsen langsung berada pada bagian terbawah dari struktur sosial-ekonomi yang lebih besar selalu memikul beban yang berat sementara itu petani bukan-produsen atau golongan elit bukan-produsen lainnya selalu memperoleh keuntungan-keuntungan dari berbagai mekanisme penarikan surplus petani.Kata kunci: petani, kebijakan, penguasaan tanah, pemerintah kolonial hindia-belanda
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".