MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2266091754 · doi:10.1049/el.2015.1724

Smartphone‐based WiFi access point localisation and propagation parameter estimation using crowdsourcing

2015· article· en· W2266091754 on OpenAlex
You Li, Haiyu Lan, Zainab Syed, Naser El‐Sheimy

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueElectronics Letters · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIndoor and Outdoor Localization Technologies
Canadian institutionsBP (Canada)University of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUploadCrowdsourcingComputer scienceReal-time computingVariance (accounting)Point (geometry)EstimationNoise (video)Artificial intelligenceEngineeringMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The locations of WiFi access points (APs) are important for WiFi positioning, especially when a propagation model is used. The parameters for the propagation model, such as the pathloss exponent and noise variance, usually are not available when localising APs in a new environment. A crowdsourcing‐based prototype system is introduced that automatically generates WiFi databases using the uploaded data during normal usage of smartphones. In this system, the adjustment algorithm is originally used for the estimation of AP localisation and propagation parameters. Preliminary experiments show that the average AP localisation error of the prototype system is about 4.0 m in a typical indoor environment with considerably reduced time and labour costs compared with traditional methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.544
Threshold uncertainty score0.601

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it