Bibliographic record
Abstract
The graduate level interior design studio is engaged with the investigation of the reciprocal relationships between body and space. The exercises presented here not only explore the body + space interaction but also include the effects of dressed body + space interaction in interiors. Furthermore, consideration is given to the fact that the layers that wrap the human body span a wide range, from the most intimate, clothing, to the scale of architecture. Clothing can be perceived as a second skin, and consequently acts as a sensorial receptor which has the capacity to inform our built environments in form and essence. Dress transforms the body into an identifiable, recognizable and acceptable entity within the specific cultural context. In addition, a dressed body can be perceived as a contextually dependent phenomenological entity which is embedded in the dynamics of social order. The design studio functioned within the framework of the ideas discussed above on various levels, from the methodology investigation of dressmaking and body enhancements to the notion of body and space as performative arenas. Ultimately, the design proposals question normative assumptions and the intensified position of interiors in light of the heightened/altered body and space interaction in the 21st century. Beden + Mekan : Studyo Estetik Lisansustu duzeyi ic mimarlik studyosu, beden ve mekanin karsilikli iliskilerinin arastirilmasiyla ilgilenmektedir. Bu makalede sunulan egzersizler sadece beden ve mekan etkilesimlerini arastirmakla kalmamakta, ayrica giydirilmis beden ve mekan etkilesimlerinin ic mekanlardaki sonuclarini da kapsamina almaktadir. Ayrica, burada goz onune alinan faktor sudur ki, insan bedenini saran katmanlar en ozelden, giysiden, mimarlik olcegine kadar genis bir cesitlilige uzanmaktadir. Giysi ikinci ten olarak algilanabilinir ve sonuc olarak duyumsal bir reseptor olarak hareket eder; ki bu durum yapili cevremizin formunu ve ozunu bilgilendirme kapasitesine sahiptir. Giysi, bedenin kendi spesifik kulturel iceriginde tanimlanabilinir, taninabilinir ve kabul edilebilir bir nesneye donusturmektedir. Ayrica, giydirilmis bir beden icerik olarak bagimli fenomenolojik bir nesne olarak algilanabilinir ki bu da sosyal duzenin dinamikleri icine yerlesmistir. Dizayn studyosu, yukarida tartisilan fikirler cercevesinde cesitli seviyelerde faaliyette bulunmustur; ki bunlar: giysi yapiminin metodolojik arastirmasindan, bedeni guclendirme, beden ve mekanin edimsel arenalari kavramina kadar uzanmaktadir. Sonuc olarak meydana gelen dizayn onermeleri, normatif varsayimlari ve ic mekanin guclendirilmis pozisyonunu 21. yuzyildaki guclendirilmis / degistirilmis beden ve mekan etkilesimi isiginda sorgular.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.012 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".