Energy Conversion Efficiency in Plasma Polymerization – A Comparison of Low‐ and Atmospheric‐Pressure Processes
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the plasma polymerization literature, there has been an interest since at least the 1970s to correlate the structure of plasma polymer (PP) deposits with plasma parameters during deposition, most particularly with the energy input per monomer molecule, E m . In our two laboratories, we have developed methods for measuring E m (or somewhat equivalent, E a ) in low‐ (LP) and atmospheric‐pressure (AP) discharge plasmas. In this article we propose a new parameter, the so‐called energy conversion efficiency, ECE , which permits direct comparison of LP and AP experiments. This is done for the case of three model monomer compounds, ethane, acetylene, and acrylic acid (AAc). “Critical” energy values that demarcate ECE regimes separating different fragmentation/reaction mechanisms agree remarkably well for all three monomers examined; resulting E m (or E a ) values are correlated with specific mechanisms, and the numerical results are convincingly supported by data from the chemical literature.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it