MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2266324454 · doi:10.1353/poe.2013.a533931

Locating Poe on New Maps

2013· article· en· W2266324454 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Paul Jones

Bibliographic record

VenuePoe Studies · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicAmerican Sports and Literature
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPeriod (music)The RenaissanceGlobal Positioning SystemHistoryComputer scienceCartographyVisual artsArt historyGeographyArtAestheticsTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In our age of Google Maps, smartphone mapping applications, and global positioning systems (GPS), we have ready access to maps. And we expect these maps to be easily customized to our individual needs, preferences, and interests and to give us multiple perspectives and options (street view vs. satellite; best routes for walking, cycling, or driving; most direct route vs. fastest, and so on). Long gone are the days when a AAA travel agent dictated our route, marked with a highlighter, and we dared not stray from the prescribed path. Kennedy and McGann’s impressive collection of new essays on Poe, which grew out of a 2009 symposium at the University of Virginia, throws out the long-used map of antebellum literary culture, one in which a handful of male writers in the northeastern United States dominated the production and reception of literature and a marginalized Poe lacked both access and infl uence. Like the new maps made possible by recent technological innovations, the ten essays in this collection provide various maps of their landscape, the vibrantly diverse print culture of the antebellum period in which Poe was an active participant, and offer readers multiple paths to their destination, an understanding of how Poe was positioned within this culture—eschewing the notion that any of these is the map that will defi nitively reveal to us Poe’s location. The volume explicitly redraws the period-naming and canon-defi ning map provided by F. O. Matthiessen’s American Renaissance (1941), which defi ned Poe as an outsider in American literary and political thought, and builds on the numerous scholarly remappings of Poe and his culture that have appeared in recent decades, including Meredith McGill’s American Literature and the Culture of Reprinting: 1834–1853 [Philadelphia: Univ. of Pennsylvania Press, 2003]; Eliza Richards’s Gender and the Poetics of Reception in Poe’s Circle [Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2004]; Terence Whalen’s Edgar Allan Poe and the Masses: The Political Economy of Literature in Antebellum America [Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press, 1999]; Jonathan Elmer’s Reading at the Social Limit: Affect, Mass Culture, and Edgar Allan Poe [Stanford: Stanford Univ. Press, 1995]; and the essays in The American Face of Edgar Allan Poe, ed. Shawn Rosenheim and Stephen Rachman [Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, 1995]. As it does

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.672
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePoe StudiesSame topicAmerican Sports and LiteratureFrench-language works237,207