MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2266492292

Engineering cyber physical systems

2015· article· en· W2266492292 on OpenAlexaff
Hausi Müller, John Mylopoulos, Marin Litoiu

Bibliographic record

VenueComputer Science and Software Engineering · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicContext-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
Canadian institutionsYork UniversityUniversity of TorontoUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCyber-physical systemTransformative learningComputer scienceContext (archaeology)Wearable computerWearable technologySystems engineeringData scienceEngineeringEmbedded system
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

CPS are smart systems that encompass computational and physical components, seamlessly integrated and closely interacting to sense the context of the real world [1]. These systems involve a high degree of complexity at numerous spatial and temporal scales and controlling software and physical components with highly networked communications. Thus, CPS comprise tightly integrated networking, computing, controlling, sensing and actuation capabilities. The societal impact of CPS is enormous. Virtually every engineered system is affected by advances in these interconnected capabilities. Future CPS applications are expected to be more transformative than the IT revolution of the past three decades [2]. Today CPS R&D affords spectacular and transformative opportunities due to the convergence of analytical and cognitive capabilities, real-time and networked control, pervasive sensing and actuating, as well as compute and storage clouds. Advancement in CPS requires a new control and systems science that encompasses both physical and computational aspects [3]. Engineering and computer science research have provided a solid foundation for spectacular progress in IT, but now we need to address the unique scientific and technical challenges for this new systems and control science for CPS. This workshop will concentrate on selected CPS foundations, applications areas, and grand challenges including networked control, adaptive systems, energy, smart oceans, assistive technologies and medical care monitoring including elderly care, transportation and mobility, autonomous systems, smart materials, and wearable devices.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.082

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.005
Scholarly communication0.0050.005
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0050.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0240.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueComputer Science and Software EngineeringSame topicContext-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsFrench-language works237,207