MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2266533971

The Remarkable Story of Adrian Atiman: Freed Slave to Medical Missionary

2013· article· en· W2266533971 on OpenAlexaff
Stephen J. Rockel

Bibliographic record

VenueSSRN Electronic Journal · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGlobal Maritime and Colonial Histories
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiographyWhite (mutation)ColonialismEthnographyHistoryAncient historyArt historyArchaeology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Some time in the early 1870s a young boy from Tundurma on the Niger River near Timbuktu was pawned and sold into slavery. Passing through a series of masters he was taken across the Sahara. In Algeria he was redeemed by White Father missionaries. Baptized Joseph Adrian Atiman, he was educated and trained in medicine. In 1888 Atiman travelled to Zanzibar and to Karema on Lake Tanganyika with a missionary caravan. Thus began a remarkable career of 67 years as a medical catechist. Atiman left a rich autobiographical account of his enslavement, manumission, and incorporation into the White Fathers’ mission and medical work. Recent work on slavery in Africa illuminates the slave experience by tracing lives from enslavement through incorporation into host societies and the construction of new identities, or social rebirth. Slaves and freed slaves were not only commodities and labourers; they also took part in the development of new communities. This paper contextualizes Atiman’s story highlighting three themes: processes of enslavement and manumission; transcontinental aspects of the 19th-century slave trade; missionaries and freed slaves in the construction of new communities in the East African interior. Sources include the autobiography of Adrian Atiman; mission documentation; colonial records; ethnographic material.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.673
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSSRN Electronic JournalSame topicGlobal Maritime and Colonial HistoriesFrench-language works237,207