MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Brain‐derived neurotrophic factor exerts depolarizing effects on hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus neurons (1126.6)

2014· article· en· W2266650095 on OpenAlexafffundabout
William M. McIsaac, Alastair V. Ferguson

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNerve injury and regeneration
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsDepolarizationNeurotrophic factorsHypothalamusTropomyosin receptor kinase BBrain-derived neurotrophic factorNeuroscienceNucleusInternal medicineChemistryReceptorEndocrinologyBiologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) is a chemical messenger that has been implicated in the central control of food intake and regulation of the stress axis. Consistent with a role in feeding behavior, TrkB, the receptor through which BDNF exerts its effects, is expressed in the PVN along with its low affinity receptor p75. Considering the paraventricular nucleus (PVN) of the hypothalamus is well established as a critical homeostatic relay center involved in the regulation of both of these systems, we investigated BDNF’s effects on the excitability of PVN neurons. Whole cell current‐clamp experiments were implemented to record from PVN neurons (N=23) in a hypothalamic slice preparation. BDNF dimer was bath applied at a concentration of 2nM for 2 minutes and elicited almost exclusively depolarizing effects (N=15) with a mean depolarization of 10.5 ± 1.74 mV. Cells responding to BDNF typically showed a return to baseline membrane potential within 200 seconds, although occasionally recoveries were not observed until 4000 seconds after application of BDNF. The results presented further elucidate the putative role of BDNF in feeding and regulation of the stress axis through its actions on PVN neurons. Grant Funding Source : Canadian Institutes of Health Research

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicNerve injury and regeneration→French-language works237,207→