MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2266686372 · doi:10.1149/ma2015-02/47/1903

Carbon Nanomaterials Doped with Sulfur for ORR in Alkaline Media

2015· article· en· W2266686372 on OpenAlexaff
Elizabeth Montiel-Macías, Perla B. Balbuena, Raynald Gauvin, Gabriel Rosado, Ysmael Verde‐Gómez

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicSynthesis and properties of polymers
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectrocatalystCyclic voltammetryNanomaterialsMaterials scienceRotating disk electrodeHeteroatomRaman spectroscopyThiopheneCarbon fibersInorganic chemistrySulfurElectrochemistryPlatinumVoltammetryChemical engineeringNanotechnologyChemistryCatalysisElectrodeOrganic chemistryComposite numberMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fuell cells are recognized as an attractive alternative for clean energy generation. However, their commercialization has been limited by the high cost of their components. Platinum supported on carbon (Pt/C) has been considered a conventional electrocatalyst due to their high electroactivity. However, recent researches works have shown that the free platinum electrocatalyst such as nanostructured carbons doped with heteroatoms (e. g. B, P, N and S) have similar electrocatalytic activities that Pt/C for oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) in alkaline media. This work present the behavior for ORR in alkaline media of nanomaterials based on carbon doped with sulfur. The materials were prepared using a modified chemical vapor deposition method. Toluene and thiophene was used as carbon and sulfur source, respectively, while ferrocene was used as growing agent. Nanocarbons morphology and textural properties are investigated by high resolution transmission and scanning microscopy, X Ray diffraction and Raman spectroscopy. Electrochemical analysis was evaluated using cyclic voltammetry (CV) and rotating disk electrode (RDE) in 0.1 M KOH media.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Meeting AbstractsSame topicSynthesis and properties of polymersFrench-language works237,207