MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2266734673

Daniel Taylor, art of conservation

2013· article· en· W2266734673 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Maurice O'Riordan

Bibliographic record

VenueArt monthly Australia · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicCultural Heritage Management and Preservation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGorillaPortraitOutreachPaintingEndangered speciesSociologyArt historyWildlifeNatural (archaeology)Environmental ethicsAestheticsLawArtHistoryArchaeologyPolitical scienceEcologyAnthropologyPhilosophyDemography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Looking at the painting Mountain Gorilla by Canadian artist Daniel Taylor I am struck by two key facotrs: the painstaking, almost obsessive quality of its rendition (acrylic on board), and its effect as an individual 'portrait' (of someone) rather than a natural scientific study of 'type'. Taylor's Mountain Gorilla is not a work that would normally be considered 'cutting-edge' or even 'contemporary' art, yet seen within his overall practice as an 'Endangered Species/High Realist Wildlife Artist' and the related outreach and educational work this has spawned, it professes an undeniable radicalism.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.172
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.129
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.124 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArt monthly AustraliaSame topicCultural Heritage Management and PreservationFrench-language works237,207