MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2266838114 · doi:10.1353/nin.2014.0007

Class A: Baseball in the Middle of Everywhere by Lucas Mann (review)

2014· article· en· W2266838114 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
William Harris Ressler

Bibliographic record

VenueNine · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicAmerican Sports and Literature
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLeagueMiddle classClass (philosophy)Media studiesHistorySociologyAdvertisingManagementPolitical scienceArtificial intelligenceLawComputer scienceBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Class A: Baseball in the Middle of Everywhere by Lucas Mann William Harris Ressler Lucas Mann. Class A: Baseball in the Middle of Everywhere. New York: Pantheon Books, 2013. 336 pp. Cloth, $26.95. Class A: Baseball in the Middle of Everywhere presents an in-depth look at a single minor-league baseball team. While this is not the first book to do so, it provides uncommon depth and breadth for those who seek a richer appreciation of the game. In Class A, the author offers an ethnographic perspective, an unusually detailed focus on a team in the low minors, barely one level above rookie ball. He essentially lived with the team for one season and parts of another, traveling [End Page 168] between the two seasons to visit the book’s protagonists in Venezuelan winter ball, at spring training, and in their homes. Because of this immersion in the internal culture and external environment of the team, Class A has much to recommend it. Any book that looks beyond baseball players’ on-field accomplishments to examine their challenges and triumphs off the field is a valuable contribution to baseball writing. For players in the low minors, these successes and failures greatly influence their future professional success. Being able to see player development more holistically enhances appreciation for players’ accomplishments. More importantly, it makes for a more informed approach to observing the game as a whole. In fact, Class A helps readers to see all the people associated with Minor League Baseball more fully—as people, not merely defined by their roles as players, employees, or supporters of a team. This contribution is significant. Too few baseball books bother to look broadly at the complicated and nuanced interrelationships among the many groups of stakeholders within the microcosm of a baseball team. Class A goes a step further, looking beyond individuals to the socioeconomic, political, and historical contexts that influence them. Even fewer baseball books add depth the way Class A does, allowing the people described within to emerge as complicated, compelling individuals—no matter that this depth appears to have been discovered accidentally. Regarding one central set of stakeholders, the author candidly admits, “These fans were supposed to be an annotation for me. Quick quotes, bits of atmosphere” (57). It is to the author’s credit, however, that as he immersed himself more deeply in his research, he succeeded in moving beyond his initial expectations and biases. Thus he discovered, in his observations of the team’s fans, that “to be here every day reveals peculiar and diverse subsets of devotion, beyond buzzwords” (69). Indeed, one of the best chapters of Class A focuses entirely on a single fan. The chapter sketches, in fine and interconnected lines that spread out subsequently throughout the book, the inner world of a particularly devoted fan of the team. The author offers insight, for example, into the significance of physical artifacts for this fan and, by extension, the many others like her who find meaning in “holding a part of the game until you, still holding it tight, have made it resonate” (106). Some readers might be uncomfortable with the author’s prominence in the narrative, which may leave readers with a feeling that this book, ostensibly about baseball, is more about the author than about the players and fans he describes. At times, this feeling results from the style in which the book is written—though, to be fair, the author appears aware of this tendency: “It [End Page 169] is stupid, probably, pretentious, definitely, to be thinking of Tennyson while looking at Kalian Sams’s back” (159). Other times, it might appear that the author attempts to make the situations described in Class A less about the team and more a series of self-referential anecdotes or painfully detailed and intimately personal emotional reactions to each event. Readers may feel uncomfortable if they are more accustomed to baseball books in which players are the protagonists and the only time the author’s voice is strongly felt is in a player’s autobiography. Class A is very much about Lucas Mann. More to the point, the book is about his reaction...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.475
Threshold uncertainty score0.970

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0300.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNineSame topicAmerican Sports and LiteratureFrench-language works237,207