MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Momordica charantia (bitter melon) improves hepatic insulin signaling

2008· article· en· W2267056269 on OpenAlexaff
Pratibha V. Nerurkar, Yun Kyung Lee, Khosrow Adeli, Vivek R. Nerurkar

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNatural Antidiabetic Agents Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersHawaii Community Foundation
KeywordsInsulin resistanceMomordicaInsulin receptorMedicineEndocrinologyInsulinInternal medicineDyslipidemiaProtein kinase BApolipoprotein BVery low-density lipoproteinPI3K/AKT/mTOR pathwayDiabetes mellitusSignal transductionCholesterolPharmacologyLipoproteinChemistryBiochemistryTraditional medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Momordica charantia (bitter melon, BM) has traditionally been used in the treatment of diabetes and its complications. Insulin resistance is characterized by resistance to insulin‐stimulated glucose uptake, leading to enhanced very low density lipoprotein (VLDL) secretion, and significant down‐regulation of hepatic insulin signaling as documented by attenuated phosphorylation of i54 nsulin receptor (IR), IR substrates (IRS‐1/IRS‐2) and PI3K, PKB/Akt. Our recent studies demonstrated that BM juice (BMJ) can significantly reduce apoB secretion, in human hepatoma cells, HepG2. The aim of our study was to evaluate the effects of BMJ on plasma apoB levels and hepatic insulin signaling cascade in mice fed high fat diet (HFD). Four to six weeks old female C57BL/6 mice were randomized into three groups of control, receiving regular rodent chow with 11 kcal% fat; high fat diet (HFD), receiving chow containing 58 kcal% fat; and HDF + 1.5% lyophilized BMJ. Our data indicates that BMJ lowers plasma apoB‐100 and apoB‐48 in HFD‐fed mice by improving the phosphorylation status of insulin receptor and its downstream signaling molecules. Investigating the mechanisms mediated by BMJ to ameliorate diabetic dyslipidemia may lead to identification of new molecular targets for dietary therapies. [Grant support by RCMI, NIH/NCRR, G12RR00361; Hawaii Community Foundation, 20041652 and NIH/NCCAM 1R21AT003719‐01A1].

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.310
Threshold uncertainty score0.505

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicNatural Antidiabetic Agents StudiesFrench-language works237,207