MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2267072368

Impact of External Representation and Task on Graph Comprehension

2006· article· en· W2267072368 on OpenAlexafffund
Leo Ferres, Gitte Lindgaard, Maria Rasouli, Avi Parush

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship (California Digital Library) · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSpatial Cognition and Navigation
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
KeywordsBar chartPie chartComprehensionComputer scienceGraphArtificial intelligenceCognitive psychologyTheoretical computer sciencePsychologyMathematicsProgramming language
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study examined the relationship between the external representation, verbal encoding vs. visual encoding, of graph information and the impact on graph comprehension.Graph comprehension tasks included responses to true/false statements addressing global and local graph information, visual recognition, and graph drawing.The findings suggest that the specific modality of the external representation play a role in the encoding and retrieval of some aspects of global vs. local graph information.The findings are discussed with reference to theories of spatial cognition.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.074
Threshold uncertainty score0.516

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship (California Digital Library)Same topicSpatial Cognition and NavigationFrench-language works237,207