Between industry and culture: Québec and Canada's broadcasting policy
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article examines the evolutionary stages of Canada's radio-television policy and its effect on the industry in Quebec. From a historical approach, we investigate the interaction between the industrial perspective, the cultural perspective and francophone society, particularity in the constitution of this policy. Many viewpoints attribute the Quebec industry's success to a strong and distinct cultural identity within Canada. We maintain that the institutional logic forming Canada's radio-televisual policy has contributed to the growth of a wellestablished and locally popular industry. Using a qualitative method of analysing content, the authors examine the temporal evolution of Canadian radio-televisual policy in order to identify the institutional factors that have contributed to the Quebec industry's success. This distinct and dynamic ecosystem is now facing some major changes due to the development of digital players and networks, and a discontinuity in the industrial vision on which national regulation was based.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it