A World Economy in 2025 and Chinese Economic Situation (China's Present Economic Policies can be maintained?)(in Japanese)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
When most populous nations like China and India become industrialized and globalized it will potentially open a new chapter in the human history. Under this major trend in the 21st century, there need foresights flexible enough to embrace non-linear changes and discontinued progress to depict future Chinese economy a quarter century from now. There are four major enterprises to do so in the last five years. Some presume continuation of present rapid growth in China for another twenty years. Others do not take global export-import relations explicitly into account, nor actions and reactions among trading partners if major driving forces of progress are exports. In this paper we first attempt to extract the factors promoting economic development that enabled China grow very fast, and explore how they will change in new economic environment in the 21st century by explicitly accessing trends of production, international trade, and technological progress. There are three major topics to be discussed: (1) Is the development policy, that China has chosen over a quarter of century, still the optimum policy in the 21st century? ; (2) Against ever increasing shares and effects of imports from China to developed countries and reactions to those, what kind of repercussions there would be? ; (3) What are better future policy choices domestically as well as internationally if domestic and international reactions are taken into account? The analyses shed lights on the eventual impasses of export-led development policy, that transformed China from a poor peasant country to an economic power and international effects form that policy in terms of domestic welfare, economic balance. They also indicate that it is China herself that would be most severely damaged from international trade turmoil and negative reactions by trading partners. To overcome these situations, China would benefit herself most if she can adapt domestic sector-led growth with a policy focusing on increasing economic efficiency. Incidentally, that policy would produce favorable effects internationally. There need precautions when these scenario analyses are applied: A linear extension of the present trends is not necessary a forecast of the future; A future is inherently uncertain. However, global model analyses capture internal consistency of logic, such as the sum of exports is always that of imports and supply must be demand.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".