Bibliographic record
Abstract
Différents modèles d'analyse ont été proposés pour tenter de comprendre les bases du mariage polygamique en Afrique. De nombreux auteurs ont annoncé le déclin imminent de la polygamie et ce, plus particulièrement en milieu urbain, laissant entendre qu'il existe une inadéquation entre cette institution matrimoniale et le mode de vie urbain. Les données dont on dispose pour le Mali nous permettent de remettre en question cette perspective. Bien qu'on ait assisté à des transformations importantes des schémas de nuptialité en zone urbaine au Mali (augmentation du célibat et élévation de l'âge moyen au mariage), il demeure néanmoins que l'incidenice de la polygamie n'a pas connu de modifications sensibles de 1960 à 1987. L'examen de quelques caractéristiques économiques des femmes en union polygame et des ménages auxquels elles appartieinnent semble offrir certaines pistes de recherche fort intéressantes pour nous aider à mieux comprendre le maintien de cette institution matrimoniale dans certaines villes africaines.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".