MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2267473483 · doi:10.1080/15476286.2015.1103427

Convergent evolution of twintron-like configurations: One is never enough

2015· review· en· W2267473483 on OpenAlexaff
Mohamed Hafez, Georg Hausner

Bibliographic record

VenueRNA Biology · 2015
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA Research and Splicing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaManitoba Beekeepers' AssociationUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIntronBiologyRNA splicingGroup II intronMinor spliceosomeEvolutionary biologyGeneticsComputational biologyAlternative splicingSplicing factorGroup I catalytic intronGeneExonRNA

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introns inserted within introns are commonly referred to as twintrons, however the original definition for twintron implied that splicing of the external member of the twintron could only proceed upon splicing of the internal member. This review examines the various types of twintron-like arrangements that have been reported and assigns them to either nested or twintron categories that are subdivided further into subtypes based on differences of their mode of splicing. Twintron-like arrangements evolved independently by fortuitous events among different types of introns but once formed they offer opportunities for the evolution of new regulatory strategies and/or novel genetic elements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.931
Threshold uncertainty score0.958

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.358
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRNA BiologySame topicRNA Research and SplicingFrench-language works237,207