MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2267646068

Abstract: A Welsh Meguma? Comparison of the Meguma Supergroup of Nova Scotia with the Harlech Dome succession of North Wales

2009· article· en· W2267646068 on OpenAlexaffabout
John W.F. Waldron, David I. Schofield

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicPaleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyOrdovicianUnconformitySLATESSiltstonePaleontologyTurbiditeBasementGeochemistryPaleozoicConglomeratePrecambrianDalradianSupergroupSedimentary rockMetamorphic rockStructural basinArchaeologyFacies
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Meguma Supergroup of southern mainland Nova Scotia is an Early Cambrian to Early Ordovician deep-water peri-Gondwanan succession. The base is not seen, but isotopic and geochronologic evidence suggest broadly ‘Avalonian’ basement. The lower part of the succession (Goldenville Group) comprises relatively quartz-rich, thickly bedded turbidites and interbedded green slates. Abundant turbidite structures indicate sedimentation continuously below wavebase, and the great thickness of the succession attests to major subsidence. The trace fossil Oldhamia indicates Early Cambrian age. At the top of the group the stratigraphy is more diverse; alternating finer and coarser units show enrichment in manganese and spectacular bioturbation. A rare trilobite-bearing horizon indicates Middle Cambrian age. A unit of manganiferous laminated slate marks the transition into the overlying Halifax Group. The overlying Cunard Formation comprises rustyweathering black pyrite-rich slate, siltstone, and sandstone with turbidite structures. Higher parts of the group possibly show a transition to shallower water conditions, with more abundant trace fossils, and rare Tremadocian graptoloids. The group is overlain with angular unconformity by the Early Silurian White Rock Formation. The succession in the Harlech Dome in North Wales is also an Early Cambrian to Early Ordovician deep-water peri-Gondwanan succession. Underlying basement is not seen but drilling has revealed ‘Avalonian’ volcanics in the subsurface. The lowest part of the Harlech Grits Group comprises Early Cambrian cross-bedded, probably deltaic sandstones which pass up into fully marine slates. The overlying Rhinog Formation consists of relatively quartzose thickly bedded turbidites and green slates. Abundant turbidite structures indicate sedimentation continuously below wavebase, suggesting significant subsidence. At the top of the group the stratigraphy is more diverse; alternating finer and coarser units show enrichment in manganese and spectacular bioturbation. Rare trilobite fragments indicate Middle Cambrian age. A unit of carbonaceous laminated slate marks the base of the overlying Mawddach Group. The overlying Maentwrog Formation comprises rusty-weathering black pyrite-rich slate, siltstone, and sandstone with turbidite structures. Trilobites indicate Late Cambrian age. Higher parts of the group show a clear transition to shallower water conditions above wavebase, with linguloid brachiopods and trilobites indicating Tremadocian age. The group is unconformably overlain by the Early Ordovician Rhobell and Aran volcanic groups. Lithological and chronological analogies between the two successions are striking. However, significant differences include: (1) the greater thickness of the Meguma succession; (2) the presence of shallow marine to non-marine strata at the base and top of the Harlech succession; (3) the possible presence of an unconformity between the two groups in Harlech; and (4) the presence of volcanics near the base and top of the Welsh succession. Nonetheless, the similarities indicate closely similar evolution for the two basins, and would be consistent with deposition in connected parts of a peri-Gondwanan rift system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.486
Threshold uncertainty score0.977

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPaleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils→French-language works237,207→