MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Chamanismes, réseaux religieux et « empowerment » dans les sociétés autochtones des Amériques

2015· article· fr· W2267707753 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Frédéric Laugrand, Robert R. Crépeau

Bibliographic record

VenueAnthropologica · 2015
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Au moment où nous écrivons ces lignes, la Commis sion de Vérité et Réconciliation (CVR / TRC 2015a) vient de déposer son rapport accablant concernant l'impact des pensionnats autochtones sur les personnes et les cultures autochtones du Canada. Dans ce volumineux rapport, la commission affirme qu'un des objectifs de l'enseignement dispensé dans les pensionnats était la destruction de la spiritualité autochtone dans le but de lui en substituer une meilleure. Alors que le territoire, la langue, la culture et l'identité autochtones sont inséparables de la spiritualité et constituent les dimensions essentielles de toute une manière d'être.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.438
Threshold uncertainty score0.871

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.006
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.140
GPT teacher head0.442
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2015
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnthropologicaSame topicIndigenous Health, Education, and RightsFrench-language works237,207