MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2267939204 · doi:10.1103/physreva.84.020502

<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi><mml:mn>4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math>band of CH<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mrow/><mml:mn>4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math>in helium nanodroplets: A probe of the dynamical response of a superfluid

2011· article· lv· W2267939204 on OpenAlexaff
Aakash Ravi, Susumu Kuma, Christopher Yearwood, Birinder Kahlon, Majd Mustafa, Watheq Al‐Basheer, Katsunari Enomoto, Takamasa Momose

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review A · 2011
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum, superfluid, helium dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsDegenerate energy levelsLine (geometry)SuperfluiditySpectroscopyAtomic physicsNuclear magnetic resonanceCondensed matter physicsGeometryQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The triply degenerate ${\ensuremath{\nu}}_{4}$ bending mode of methane in superfluid helium nanodroplets was observed at 7.7 $\ensuremath{\mu}$m by high-resolution infrared depletion spectroscopy. Five rotational transitions were detected, with a minimum linewidth of only 65 MHz. The observed lines showed slightly asymmetric line shapes, especially in the case of the $P(2)$ and $R(1)$ rotational lines. Analysis of the line shape indicates that the superfluid environment has a finite response time of a few nanoseconds to equilibrate upon rotational excitation of CH${}_{4}$.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.946
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.005
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.004
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0040.004
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review ASame topicQuantum, superfluid, helium dynamicsFrench-language works237,207