Феномен эмиграции осетин в страны Северной Америки в конце XIX - начале XX века
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article considers the question of the emigration of the Ossetians in the late XIX early XX century in North America: United States of America and Canada. This emigration was caused by seasonal work one of the variants of economic activity that existed among the peasants, and widespread in Russia in the XVIII early XX centuries. Mass movement of the ossetians began in the early twentieth century and continued until the beginning of the first world war. Basically, people from Ossetia lived in large cities in the U.S. and Canada, as employment opportunities there was higher: Los Angeles, San Francisco, Fresno, Seattle, Portland, Chicago, Vancouver and others cities. In exile was attended by representatives of Tagaurian, Kurtat, Alagir and Digor societies Ossetia. The study greatly contributes to the prevailing ideas about the emigration of Ossetians in America and Canada can objectively evaluate their inclusion in the new economic, socio-political and cultural space, as well as contribute to a better and updated study of the institute of оssetians in the late XIX early XX century.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".