Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Problem-solving environments (PSEs) offer a powerful yet flexible and convenient means for general experimentation with computational methods, algorithm prototyping, and visualization and manipulation of data. Consequently, PSEs have become the modus operandi of many computational scientists and engineers. However, despite these positive aspects, PSEs typically do not offer the level of granularity required by the specialist or algorithm designer to conveniently modify the details. In other words, the level at which PSEs are black boxes is often still too high for someone interested in modifying an algorithm as opposed to trying an alternative. In this article, we describe odeToJava, a Java-based PSE for initial-value problems in ordinary differential equations. odeToJava implements explicit and linearly implicit implicit-explicit Runge--Kutta methods with error and stepsize control and intra-step interpolation (dense output), giving the user control and flexibility over the implementational aspects of these methods. We illustrate the usage and functionality of odeToJava by means of computational case studies of initial-value problems (IVPs).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it