MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2268395976 · doi:10.1139/cjce-2015-0381

Suspended solids in an end pit lake: potential mixing mechanisms

2015· article· en· W2268395976 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
Gregory A. Lawrence, Edmund W. Tedford, Roger Pieters

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Civil Engineering · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersUniversity of British ColumbiaSyncrude
KeywordsOil sandsTailingsMixing (physics)GeologyEnvironmental scienceHydrology (agriculture)Mining engineeringGeotechnical engineeringChemistryMaterials scienceAsphalt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The production of crude oil from the Canadian oil sands has generated tailings ponds that contain oil sands process-affected water and oil sands fluid fine tailings (FFT). One remediation strategy is to backfill a mined out pit with FFT and cap this with a mix of oil sands process-affected water and fresh water to form a lake, called an end pit lake. Here we discuss various mechanisms governing the vertical mixing of suspended solids in an end pit lake. Depending on the depth of the water cap, wind waves can cause mixing between the water cap and the FFT. Other potential mixing mechanisms include: convection due to salt-water exclusion during ice formation, penetrative convection due to surface cooling, gas emission from the FFT, and internal wave activity. Data collected at Syncrude Canada Limited’s Base Mine Lake in 2013 and 2014 are used to demonstrate the effects of some of these processes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.543
Threshold uncertainty score0.698

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations41
Published2015
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Civil EngineeringSame topicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysisFrench-language works237,207