MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2268477738

State-Building and Boundaries in a Multi-cultural Environment

2014· article· en· W2268477738 on OpenAlexaff
Hristina Dobreva

Bibliographic record

VenueSSRN Electronic Journal · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEuropean Politics and Security
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsState formationState-buildingPolitical economyBureaucracyModernityEconomic systemIdeologyPolitical scienceSociologyLawEconomics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Boundary is a transition of the system to a new historical structure, a moving trajectory in complex interdependence. Nowadays there are no boundaries but rather a system of new/post modernity, transformation, individualization, society fragmentation, increased global risk. This is the system of Beck’s “reflexive modernization” in multicultural risk-societies where we need to re-shape ad-hoc decisions and create a hybrid world, an open system. The traditional system with boundaries emphasizes on several models of state-building by comparing the internal and external variables of Hintze and Tilly. Military organization is state organization (Hintze) and internal variables are the structure of social classes, army’s composition, constitutional composition, social balance. External variable is war and ordering of states. War-making causes state-making through the process of extraction (Tilly) and cultural homogenization causes state-making. Army organization reflects state organization and the first represents domestic variables’ importance. Bureaucracy in the army leads to absolutism (Prussia), ideological division of the army causes alteration between absolutism and conservatism, purchases in the army result in parliamentarism and a loose structure of the army bring a feudal system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.300
Threshold uncertainty score0.796

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSSRN Electronic JournalSame topicEuropean Politics and SecurityFrench-language works237,207