Finite element modeling of Lamb wave propagation in composite stepped joints
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The objective of this research is to evaluate the integrity of a composite bonded joint by simulating Lamb wave propagation using finite element methods. The structure of interest is composed of two stepped carbon fiber reinforced polymer plates bonded together by an adhesive film. Two different bonding conditions are examined for the joint: undamaged and damaged (with disbond). In the finite element model, an antisymmetric guided wave is excited by imposing an out-of-plane displacement on the surfaces and a spatial Fourier transform is performed before and after the bond line for extraction of reflection and transmission coefficients. For validation, experiments are also conducted using two colocalized rectangular piezoceramics for plane wave generation. A 3D laser Doppler vibrometer is employed for noncontact measurement of the in-plane and out-of-plane velocity. The results confirm the reflections from the steps’ edges, and it is found that the level of reflection and transmission of the guided wave mode is different for undamaged and damaged joints. The antisymmetric mode in the pulse-echo configuration seems to be an efficient mode and strategy for disbond detection in composite repairs. The results verify that guided wave propagation is very effective for disbond detection in composite bonded joints and scarf repairs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".