MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2268856927 · doi:10.21273/hortsci.35.3.433c

245 Apples of Northeastern America

2000· article· en· W2268856927 on OpenAlexaffabout
Shahrokh Khanizadeh, Yvon Groleau, J. Cousineau, Bertrand Thériault, Jennifer R. DeEll, C. Beldica, H. Boddington

Bibliographic record

VenueHortScience · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Physiology and Cultivation Studies
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHardiness (plants)RootstockCultivarHorticultureSpring (device)BiologyFruit treeGeographyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

One of the major problems affecting apple trees in Eastern Canada is low temperature injury during the winter and spring. Although there have been many studies on the cold hardiness of apple trees, no survey has been done on winter injury in Québec orchards. A survey was conducted in 1995/1996 to identify factors responsible for apple tree mortality during the winter of 1993/1994 in Québec. Three-hundred-thirty (330) apple orchards were visited and information on more than 50 characteristics were evaluated via a questionnaire; including hardiness, end use, shelf-life, etc. A full report is available at http://www.pgris.com . A large diversity of cultivars and rootstocks was observed in the Québec orchards, and thus a database was created containing information for all cultivars evaluated and the collected agronomic characteristics. Some of the more important information, such as hardiness, end use, shelf-life, scab resistance, etc., along with 265 apple images, were put together as a poster. A copy of this poster is available from http://www.pgris.com .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.896
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHortScienceSame topicPlant Physiology and Cultivation StudiesFrench-language works237,207