Role of microtubules in LPS-induced macrophage inflammatory protein-2 production from rat pneumocytes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We have recently demonstrated that primary cultured rat pneumocytes produce macrophage inflammatory protein-2 (MIP-2) in response to lipopolysaccharide (LPS) stimulation. In this study, we found that brefeldin A, by blocking anterograde transport from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) to the Golgi apparatus, decreased LPS-induced MIP-2 in the culture medium and increased its storage in cells. This suggests that MIP-2 is secreted via a pathway from the ER to the Golgi apparatus, a process commonly regulated by microtubules. We further found that LPS induced depolymerization of microtubules as early as 1 min after LPS stimulation, and it lasted at least for 4 h. Preventing depolymerization of microtubules with paclitaxel (Taxol; 10 nM to 10 microM) partially inhibited LPS-induced MIP-2 production, whereas the microtubule-depolymerizing agents colchicine (1-10 microM) and nocodazole (1-100 microM) increased LPS-induced MIP-2 protein production without affecting MIP-2 mRNA expression. These results suggest that in pneumocytes, LPS-induced microtubule depolymerization is involved in LPS-induced MIP-2 production and that secretion of MIP-2 from pneumocytes is via the ER-Golgi pathway.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".