The Evolution of Urban Green Areas in Romania during 2002-2013
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The small size of green areas in Romanian urban settlements remains a problem of current \nurbanization, having a negative impact on the healthy lifestyle of the population. Nowadays, the green \nareas from most of the Romanian cities are under the WHO standard of 50 m2/inhabitant, under the \nE.U. standard of 26 m2/inhabitant, and also under the national standard (94 urban settlements-29.4% \nhave less than 10 m2/inhabitant of green area in 2013). Furthermore, the evolution of green areas after \n2002, shows that almost a quarter of Romanian urban settlements (24.5%) recorded significant \ndeclines, some towns having less than one square meter per inhabitant. This study presents a detailed \nanalysis of Romanian urban green areas, their evolution over the period 2002-2013, based on the \nlatest data provided by INS (National Institute of Statistics), identifying in the same time the causes \nand effects that led to the current situation. Mapping the results and identifying regional disparities, \nalong with proposing measures to increase urban green areas are also objectives achieved in this \nstudy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it