MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2269267092

Abstract: MicroCT analysis of mineral phases, total and effective porosity in the Abenaki Formation, Scotian Shelf offshore eastern Canada

2008· article· en· W2269267092 on OpenAlexaffabout
Donovan J. Blissett, Tom A. Al, Karl E. Butler, Dave Keighley

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStyloliteGeologyCarbonateMineralogyCalcitePorosityGrainstoneMineralCarbonate rockDolomiteGeochemistrySedimentary rockGeomorphologySedimentary depositional environmentMaterials science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ongoing research on petroleum reservoirs offshore Nova Scotia includes analyses of carbonate material from the Abenaki Formation utilizing MicroComputed X-ray Tomography (microCT) a non-invasive procedure for imaging the internal structure of opaque objects. This method records spatial variations in the X-ray attenuation coefficient caused by mineralogical and porosity variations in a rock. The large differences between the attenuation of X-rays by solids, relative to that of air (i.e. pore space), ultimately permits the imaging and quantification of interparticle-, intraparticleand fracture-porosity in a sample. To date 22 core fragments from 6 wells, namely Panuke H08, Panuke IA/1, Demascota G-32, Acadia K-62, Margaree F-70 and Albatross B-13, have been sampled in the form of small plugs approximately 11 mm in diameter. A variety of carbonate textures have been sampled in order to identify limitations and error ranges under differing analytical conditions using a Skyscan 1072 MicroCT scanner, with spatial resolution of approximately 10 μm. Textures include intercrystalline limestone with pinpoint vugs, stylolites, inclusions and fractures (H-08), intercrystalline limestone to dolomitic limestone with vugs (Panuke IA/1), intercrystalline limestone to dolomitic limestone having pinpoint vugs (G-32), intercrystalline dolomitic limestone with vugs in association with horizontal fracturing, oolites, pisolites and sporadic stylolites (K-62), intercrystalline limestone to dolomitic limestone with vugs, with sporadic fractures and stylolites (F-70) and pelloidal, oolitic lime grainstone, with intercrystalline pore cement (B-13). With reference to effective porosity, preliminary analysis of sample plug 12 from Panuke H-08 with bulk porosity of ~8% shows an average of 4.44% effective porosity. This means that approximately 50% of the total pore space (for this sample) that are sufficiently interconnected to provide conduits for fluid movement. Carbonate samples tend to have a limited number of mineral phases present. This leads to the additional possibility of quantifying each phase by recognition of discrete grey-scale values. Preliminary microCT scans of a hydrothermal dolomite were undertaken at relatively low X-ray energy (< 100 keV). At such energies the photoelectric effect is primarily responsible for attenuation and the attenuation coefficient is a function of the effective atomic number (Zeff), with attenuation increasing

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.050
Threshold uncertainty score0.101

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis→French-language works237,207→