MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2269406957 · doi:10.25916/sut.26269918

Basalt FRP reinforcing bars for concrete structures

2013· article· en· W2269406957 on OpenAlexaff
Fareed Elgabbas, Ehab A. Ahmed, Brahim Benmokrane

Bibliographic record

VenueSwinburne Research Bank (Swinburne University of Technology) · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBasalt fiberFibre-reinforced plasticAramidMaterials scienceBasaltComposite materialFiberGlass fiberGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The increasing use of fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) bars encourages utilizing new fiber types, such as basalt fibers, rather than the commonly used fibers (glass, aramid, and carbon). However, extensive investigations are needed to evaluate the short- and long-term characteristics of these newly developed bars. This investigation aims at characterizing newly developed basalt fiber-reinforced polymer (BFRP) bars and tendons. The investigation included physical and mechanical characterizations of two different products of deformed BFRP bars (type A and type B) of 8 mm-diameter and one product of BFRP tendons of 7 mm diameter (for prestressing purposes). The test results confirmed that the developed BFRP bars meet the physical and mechanical properties requirements of CSA S807-10.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSwinburne Research Bank (Swinburne University of Technology)Same topicStructural Behavior of Reinforced ConcreteFrench-language works237,207